← All case studies

A clean withdrawal, and a clear route back, after a permissions lapse

With its permissions at risk and an application heading the wrong way, a corporate finance firm took MEMA's advice to withdraw before a decision. Its record stayed clean and a re-authorisation route was mapped.

  • Clean
    Regulatory record, no refusal
  • Mapped
    Route back to authorisation
Architectural image illustrating the story: A clean withdrawal, and a clear route back, after a permissions lapse

The challenge

The firm faced a lapse in its FCA permissions, and its in-flight application was no longer the right route. Pushed to a decision, it risked an adverse outcome on the firm's regulatory record.

Regulatory context

How the FCA treats a refusal compared with a withdrawal, and re-authorisation through a restructured legal entity.

What we did

  1. Weighed the application against the FCA's position and the firm's restructuring plans
  2. Advised withdrawing rather than risking an adverse decision
  3. Managed the FCA engagement through the withdrawal, ahead of the deadline
  4. Mapped a clean route to re-authorisation under the right entity, for when the firm is ready

The outcome

The firm's regulatory record protected, with a mapped route back to authorisation for when it is ready.

Withdrawn on MEMA's advice ahead of the FCA's deadline, with the route to re-authorisation mapped.

Client details are presented to protect confidentiality. Outcomes reflect specific engagements and are not a guarantee of results, as every firm's circumstances differ.

Facing something similar?

Book a scoping call and we'll talk through your situation.

Book a free scoping call