Leaving An AR Network ยท Going Direct

Appointed Representative to Direct FCA Authorisation

If you are currently an Appointed Representative and want to leave your principal or network and become directly authorised, the decision reaches further than a single application. It means scoping your own permissions, building the compliance function your principal has been providing, and planning a handover that protects your clients and your regulatory standing while you make the switch. MEMA supports firms through that process end to end.

The Position

What the AR-to-direct transition actually involves

Section 39, FSMA 2000

The AR Exemption

An appointed representative carries on regulated activities under the regulatory umbrella of an FCA-authorised principal firm, which takes on regulatory responsibility for the AR's activities under section 39 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

6 to 12 Months

FCA Application Assessment

The FCA's own assessment of a direct authorisation application typically runs 6 to 12 months once submitted. Firms need separate preparation time before they are ready to submit a credible application.

9 to 18 Months

Typical Full Transition

From the point preparation begins to the point the FCA grants authorisation and the firm can operate independently, the typical transition runs 9 to 18 months. The firm continues trading as an AR under its principal throughout.

July 2022

FCA Dear CEO Letter to Principals

The FCA told principal firms it had found significant levels of harm arising from AR activity and that many principals were failing to adequately oversee their ARs. Supervisory attention on the AR model, and the firms operating under it, has increased since.

Why Firms Make This Move

Direct authorisation trades a lower-cost, faster start for control. For an AR that has outgrown the arrangement, the trade tends to run the other way.

Regulatory control

As an AR, the principal controls the compliance framework, permissions and oversight. Direct authorisation means the firm sets its own compliance arrangements and risk appetite.

Product flexibility

An AR is restricted to activities within its principal's permission scope and appetite. A directly authorised firm has full flexibility within its own permission set.

Brand independence

Some principals require co-branding or impose brand guidelines. Direct authorisation gives the firm complete control over its brand and market positioning.

Exit and dependency

As an AR, contractual notice periods apply and the client book may be subject to the principal's terms. A directly authorised firm has no dependency on a third party for its regulatory status.

The commercial argument usually comes down to the ongoing cost of the principal relationship. An AR paying in the region of 15-25% of revenue to a principal, or a comparable revenue share or oversight fee, is making a significant ongoing transfer. For a firm generating meaningful revenue, that cost can overtake the one-off cost of obtaining and maintaining direct authorisation within roughly twelve to twenty-four months.

What We Do

From the decision to go direct through to a completed, independent authorisation

Application & Evidence Build

  • Perimeter and permissions scoping against the RAO and PERG
  • Regulatory business plan, financial projections and Threshold Conditions evidence
  • SMF appointments, Statements of Responsibilities and fitness & propriety assessments
  • A compliance monitoring programme built for independent operation, not inherited from the principal

Principal Exit & Handover

  • AR agreement review, including notice periods and client book provisions
  • Planning the handover of regulatory responsibilities and client notifications
  • Sequencing the exit against your authorisation timeline
  • Continuity of service through to a clean regulatory handover

End-to-End Application Management

  • FCA case management and liaison through to approval
  • Senior Manager interview preparation
  • Building the independent compliance function and reporting capability a directly authorised firm needs from day one
  • Governance frameworks sized to the firm you are now, not the AR you were

Mistakes We Help Firms Avoid

Patterns we see repeatedly in firms making this transition

Treating the AR route as a permanent arrangement rather than a staging post, until the cumulative principal fees outweigh the one-off cost of independent authorisation
Underestimating the dependency risk in the AR agreement: principals can typically terminate on 30 to 90 days' notice, for any reason or no reason
Assuming AR status means a lighter regulatory burden. SM&CR has applied to ARs since December 2019, and conduct, financial promotion and compliance obligations still apply in full
Leaving the transition planning too late. Building an independent compliance function, reporting capability and governance structure from a standing start takes time, and twelve to eighteen months of lead time is a realistic minimum

Frequently Asked Questions

Select a question to view the answer.

Related Services

If you oversee Appointed Representatives rather than operating as one, see our page for principal firms.

Talk to us about leaving your principal

Whether you have already decided to go direct or are still weighing it up against staying an AR, tell us where you stand and we will come back to you.

We reply to enquiries directly. No newsletter sign-up, no sales sequence.

Planning To Leave Your Principal?

Twelve to eighteen months of lead time is a realistic minimum for a properly built application and a clean exit. The earlier you start planning, the more control you keep over both.

๐Ÿ“ž Phone: 0330 133 0811

๐Ÿ“ง Email: contact@memaconsultants.com