FIX A REGULATORY ISSUE

Respond To The FCA

FCA Supervisory Response

Structure, evidence and senior oversight for an FCA supervisory response.

A Dear CEO letter, an information request or a thematic review is not correspondence to be answered and filed. The FCA sets the regulatory purpose and expects reliable evidence in return, and how a firm answers shapes what follows. The task is to respond openly under Principle 11 while keeping control of your own governance, evidence and remediation. MEMA supports firms through that from the first letter to closure.

SERVICE OVERVIEW

FCA Supervisory Response Support

Bring structure, evidence and senior oversight to an FCA supervisory response.

Firms responding to a Dear CEO letter, information request, thematic review or serious control concerns. A controlled response with clear workstreams, evidence ownership and durable remediation.

Evidence we help you build

  • Response and mobilisation plan
  • Evidence register and secure review process
  • Root-cause and remediation analysis
  • Board reporting and sustainability testing

Typical timeframe

Depends on the request

The timetable usually follows the deadlines in the FCA's letter or request, so we do not quote a standard duration.

Ideal for

  • Firms responding to a Dear CEO letter
  • Firms with an open information request
  • Firms in a thematic review
  • Firms facing serious control concerns

Where is the response today?

  • Mobilisation
  • Evidence control
  • Findings
  • Remediation

How MEMA helps you

  • Mobilisation & Governance
  • Evidence Control
  • Findings To Durable Remediation

Frequently Asked Questions

Select a question to view the answer.

What should a firm do first after a Dear CEO letter?

Establish who owns the response before drafting any of it. Confirm the deadline and exactly what has been asked, name a single accountable owner, decide which governance forum signs it off, and agree how evidence will be gathered and recorded. Firms that start by writing the reply tend to discover late that the underlying facts do not support it.

How open does a firm have to be with the FCA?

Principle 11 requires a firm to deal with its regulators in an open and cooperative way, and to disclose anything of which the FCA would reasonably expect notice. In practice that means not waiting to be asked about something you have already found. Being forthcoming about a problem you are actively fixing is a materially better position than the FCA discovering it later.

What makes an evidence process credible?

The firm should record the source system, extraction method, period, population, owner and reviewer for each delivery, with controlled access and clear links between evidence, findings and actions.

How should remediation be sustained after the review?

Actions should address root cause, have accountable owners and be tested through management information, quality assurance and follow-up monitoring so improvement is not limited to the report response.

Practical review and remediation support

A response the evidence can support

We map the FCA's questions to the relevant entities, periods and records, reconcile management's explanations and prepare a response that states both what is evidenced and what remains uncertain.

What you receive: Request and evidence matrix, controlled response pack and clearly owned next steps.

We agree whether MEMA is advising, implementing changes or providing independent assurance. Where roles could conflict, the scope and reviewer separation must address that before the work starts.

Speak to a specialist

Tell us where things stand

Whether a Dear CEO letter has just landed, an information request is open, or a thematic review is underway or another supervisory communication, tell us the position and we will come back to you.

0330 133 0811

Prefer to talk it through first? Call and you will speak to a consultant, not a switchboard.

We reply to enquiries directly. No newsletter sign-up, no sales sequence.